Tuesday, January 31, 2012

Tuesday 013112

So, January done.  How ya’ doin’ with those New Year’s resolutions?

On whole I feel pretty good about this month, but I am still not being disciplined about getting to the gym.  No surprises there because given an hour, I am more interested in lacing up my shoes and getting out for some miles versus pushing weight.  I would have to find more time in my day to get to the gym regularly, or I would have to drastically change my approach to get to the gym.  Meaning something like me saying, “Wednesday and Saturday or not running days but instead gym days.”  And I am not there yet.  With days getting (more or less) nicer, the temptation to get outdoors will be even greater.

That said, I can see, more than ever, that the choices I make outside of running have profound impacts on my running.  I can see the weakness in certain hip range motions and how some work will help address that.  I can “see” better how what I put in my mouth on Tuesday impacts my run on Thursday – and even my general disposition.

I feel decent about the progress I have been making this year.  My work assignments shifted up a bit, and we had a pretty busy month at home with music activities, Scouting outings, and various projects.  In light of that, I have been still picking at making speed progress, not chasing overall mileage numbers too much, and putting in a decent January that could be a foundation for efforts in the summer

I still have not landed on what races, if any, I will do in 2012.  My head has bounced between Pikes (of course), the triple crown of burro races, skipping Pikes altogether and hanging out at Leadville and possibly pacing.  There is the thought of a 5k or a 10k race in there, but I have not landed on anything yet and that does not bug me.  I have considered heading to Nick’s race up north in the spring, but there is not a lot of itch there.  Steamboat comes into the mind occasionally as well, but I realize that committing to a 100 is a whole different game.  I have been toying with the idea of trying to break 5 in the mile, which honestly would be gaddang eye bleeding hard.  If I am looking forward to anything, it is a week of playing in the mountains post Memorial Day with chainsaws, running some high passes and tapping a keg (in that order by the way).

Riddle weighs in on his UPOY (a little aged by interweb standards, sorry).

Heat slowing you down is in your head.

Burch is joining the Army.

In response to Brandon’s daily diverson, I post the following non-work safe alternative.

Sunday, January 29, 2012

Sunday 012912 Pinewood Derby

I am hoping that several of the parents that had much better cameras than mine got some better shots!

JZ with five years of Pinewood Derby cars.
P1290057 
Building out the track.
P1290025
JZ at work on track assembly and tuning
P1290027
Almost ready before the crowds arrive
P1290028
Straight lines
P1290030 
The cars … Webelos II (5th graders)
P1290032 
Tiger Scouts (First graders)
P1290033
Bears (I think) (3 graders)
P1290034
Webelos I cars (4th graders)
P1290035P1290038
Wolf scouts (2nd graders)
P1290039
Family division (siblings, parents, grandparents alumni)
P1290036 P1290037  

JZ running the start at the track
P1290045
a busy day …!
P1290048

Training week ending 012912

Monday 012312felt okay, but a bit flat.  Kept it easy and decided to fix it in sub 150 today (although I left it open in my head that if I felt great after a couple miles that I would get some quality in).  AHR 146, MHR 151, 8 minute pace on the nose on a flat-slight roller course (320 climbing).  11 miles.

Tuesday 012412cold gray day.  Met up with Bob over at Coalton trailhead.  We jogged over to Single Tree, and started our 4 by a mile with equal rest.  These were a slight uphill effort (anywhere from 0 percent grade to 7 percent grade, and gaining 175 feet in the  mile).  6:59. 6:58, 6:58, 6:53, with a MHR of 177). 

image

12 miles on the day.  Most definitely dealing with some sort of cold.  My nose was running (clear) most of the afternoon, and I was sneezing like I had allergies.  Felt good about the fact that I was able to keep Bob within a handful or so of seconds on each.  He noted that I was not changing pace on the flatter sections, and that is where he’d gap me (versus the hills).

Wednesday 012512pretty sluggish most of the day and feeling like I had been stung in the nose with this cold.  I was leaking like a bad faucet and sneezing like I was in a field full of pollen.  In any case, I dragged over in the afternoon to Broomstock, and figured I could sweat a bit of this crud out of my system.  After about 2 miles, I bounced into JJ and ran with him for about 5 or so miles.  He peeled off (I slowed him down significantly for sure) and I finished up for 10 easy miles.  Run went pretty quickly and I got my good sweat, but I was still fighting my nasal drip.

Thursday 012612easy seven and felt like crap.  When I got home TZ looked at me, and did a quick check:  “you have a fever.”  That would explain why I felt like crap on the run.  8:30 pace and the HR was jacking all over the place – reflecting the health of my entire system.

Friday 012712TZ pushed some cold meds on me this AM, and they seemed to help a great deal.  Enough that I was seriously considering doing 10 today.  I paused, realizing that I want to have a bigger day with quality tomorrow.  So I only did 6, feeling 10x better than yesterday, but still realizing I am a bit compromised.

Saturday 012812still fighting the cold a bit, but I felt a lot better.  I got out a bit before the group (Aaron, Lucho, Shad, JP, Bob) agreed upon time to get in a lap on the Davidson Mesa.  On this lap, I went as fast as I could while it felt as effortless as possible.  So in other words – super easy and slow, but as I warmed up things started to click a bit.   It was pretty chilly out (teens).  Joined up with a group for that warm up lap (which was naturally a bit faster) and then we got into the progression run.  I had decided that I would do the 9 mile (3 laps) flavor over this rather than the 6 mile version I had done a few weeks ago (back on 1-7-2012).  I started markedly more conservatively (as did the group as a whole. 

Things went down like this:  6:52, 6:42, 6:48 (tied my shoe in that one) (averaging on first lap 6:48 – or 20:24) , 6:47, 6:32, 6:26 (averaging 6:35 on that lap –or 19:45), 6:32, 6:27, 6:06 (averaging 6:22 on that lap – or 19:06). (sum for workout was 59:15, averaging 6:35s for the hour).

Keep in mind the first mile in each loop is slightly climbing and slightly into the wind, and the last mile in each loop is down hill / down wind.
image image
I really tried to ease into this, keeping the effort steady but relaxed for the first lap.  On the last lap, as some of the guys had opted for two laps instead of three (or some had decided for four), I was able to break up the effort a bit by focusing on going by folks.  Finished this off with a 5 mile-ish warm down with Bob for 20 on the day. 

I feel pretty good about this effort.  I got in and out unscathed, and I had a decent progression in the middle.  I did not feel great in this and I did not feel poor.  I was just there, with a bit of illness, some heavy legs, but working with what I have.  The times are not zippy at 6:35 (for me, compared to recent past) but in the midst of a long run and for January, I am happy with it.

But perhaps most importantly,  while I am focused on overall shorter efforts at this point, I am trying to “touch” the longer run periodically.  Last year, I only had one effort outdoors that was not a race of some sort at 20 miles or longer.  This year I have already had 2.  I am going to try to maintain this sort of routine in the midst of the other training: a longer-ish run every couple weeks, but maintaining a focus on the shorter stuff.  As the weather breaks to spring, and the goals shift, I will look to build on this run by shifting it more to the hills and building its volume carefully.  Today was a nice bonus in that I got both a long run and a workout out of it – but that will not be the expectation every time.

Sunday 012912 – AM, easy easy.  I felt good, and probably could have gone a bit more after it.  To temper the run, I ran with the dogs. 10 miles.  AHR 137.

76 on the week, 10 hours.  Decent interval session (they might have been a tad long), good long run with a tempo in there.  Lacking on any sort of hills (okay for this time of year), and gym work (I just need to be better on this).  I feel pretty good with the week, particularly in light of the fever in the midst of it.

Saturday, January 28, 2012

Saturday 012811

Processed in 57 cars in impounding for the Pinewood Derby last night.  There were some other 20 plus cars processed Thursday night so we will have a full go of it tomorrow. 

Great run this AM with Aaron, Lucho, Shad, JP, and Bob – thanks guys!  (PS – I am ready for warmer temps).

Today’s listening.

Mo’ sportin’ some interesting chops.  I thought it was a shadow at first.

Tony has got his next race starting line figured out.  A trip to NZ sounds pretty sweet.

Can you run faster than this 11 year old? (click 5k results, all divisions and notice 3rd place).  For what it is worth, I don’t poo poo kids doing this sort of thing at those ages if they are into it, and assumedly they are not getting pressured unnecessarily (mouthful I know) by their parents.  I know folks question if they will burn out, but it still seems like a better path than what I typically read most American kids are becoming …

That said, I do scratch my head a bit over the kids trying 100s at 17 years old.  I don’t discourage it as much as I would encourage cranking it up at shorter distances at that age.  That said – that is one I don’t push too much because when you are 17, you have it figured out.  At least I did.  I unlearned all that by 35 or so though.

And more kid fun.

Friday, January 27, 2012

Friday 012712

Blog roll is temporarily down.  I went to change it, and then it got all hosed, and apparently this is a known issue with Google.

Sponsorship is increasingly becoming a tough gig.

Listening about IT RD, and all around good egg Footfeathers.  Best part was when he talked smack about Brandon

JZ got his cast off.  They can’t see a break in there so there was no need to keep it on.  He claims it is still a bit tender when he “moves it fast.”

I am fighting a fever.  Hopefully it will be broken by tomorrow, as I am expecting to go long over at Davidson Mesa, with a 6-9 mile progression in the middle.  The group will probably start around 7, but I am going to probably get out there around 6:30 to get some miles in.

This year JZ is struggling a bit onc ompletion of his car.  He has put off working on it quite a few times and is now stressing.  He was not open to an option I provided - “you don’t have to enter a car if you don’t want to.”   It is his last year to work on one, and of course I want to him be successful, but it does not feel correct to outright save him on this one.  Bigger lessons I like to think.  I worked the car “impounding” and it is incredibly obvious in some cases where a kid has done all the work on the car, and alternatively they have done none of it.  Thankfully most cars come somewhere in the middle.

Anyway …

IMG-20120127-00035 IMG-20120127-00029

I saw the other of the pair in a tree down the trail a few minutes later.

Thursday, January 26, 2012

Thursday 012611

Ian Sharman’s new podcast dedicated to ultrarunning is out.  Excellent first episode.

Anton contemplates the performance gains we have seen in distance running as of late, specifically how stuff that would kick butt a few years ago is now ho-hum(ish).

I got this pointer from Justin.  No surprise, neither Justin or me made the cut of the top 100 running blogs you should be reading.  Wyatt gets a nod at number 68, Dunlap hits number 17 and Geoff pops in at 10.  No Nick?  No Anton?  No Irunfar?!  This travesty makes the UPOY voting look legit.

On a run recently, I recognized a runner coming up the opposite direction on the path as a guy I have seen running in some shared competitions, and around town.  We have never chatted, so I swung around as he came up the path and made the quick introduction:  "Hey, we both ran such and such race.  Care for some company?.  After assuring I was not interrupting some workout of his, we quickly fell into that familiar back and forth of recalling various races.  It is easy to fall into conversations with runners.  Have you ever run the blahdey blah blah half?  What are you training for?  How’d that race go? 

I asked What kind of training are you doing now?  and learned that this high school senior was shooting for a top position at the state meet in track in one of the longer distances.  I probed a bit, asking what sort of time that would take, how close he was to that now, and if he thought his objective was attainable.  There was little doubt in his ability to actually achieve such a result, but it was clear (although unsaid) that he was not fully dedicated to taking the path to get to that goal in four months.  I asked straight up (with the caveat that I knew I was pushing on him a bit and that I did not know him) if he was willing to make the sacrifices between now and then to accomplish that goal OR if he would be happier just enjoying every run between now and then but at the risk of not making it at the state meet. 

Without hesitation he answered he be happy to run how he wanted every day, free of the structure of particular training, and would leave the state meet goal behind.  I was not particularly surprised by his answer, as I sort of suspected this was where his mind was at. 

Our motivations to run are often different.  Some have an objective or a goal like some race and every decision about how they run, what they run, where they run, are derived from the focus on that end.  Some of us have motivations to run for the enjoyment of that day, that moment.  And there is of course a spectrum of in between.  I am not prescribing that one is right and one is wrong, or that one is better than the other.  I have run with folks that could not care less about competing, and I have run with folks that have that laser focus on an objective almost a year away.    I find both view points interesting but I really like to dig in when there is a bit of dissonance between these two view points in the person’s head.  The person for example that says they run for today but then gets a pissed at the race result.  Or the “racer” that grumbles about the training cycle not being what they want to do.

For what it is worth, I see myself dealing with both of these as I teeter on the fence.

On a lighter note …

referenced from Jay Johnsonactive stretching video from Phil Wharton.  I have SUCKED at doing the gym or stretching work I think I need to be doing.  And what these guys and gals do in this video are nutty flexible to me.

Ulrich challenges some possible assumptions made by the vegan diet making one a better runner.

There are no good workouts, only good trainingExcellent podcast interview with Pete Magill where he speaks honestly as to how he recently botched a workout, which in turn eliminated his chances to repeat as Club Masters XC National champ.

Wednesday, January 25, 2012

Wednesday 012512

Thornley gets the WS director post.

Headlamp review … I am a Storm user.

Training in the 80s was so much more intense.


More seriously, Bill Gates kicks arse.

More nodding to MTB craziness …

Tuesday, January 24, 2012

Tuesday 012412

Got this from Kena diet of an Olympic Marathoner.

I know this guy ain’t everyone’s cup of brew.  I am proud to call him a friend.

(that said, I reserve the right to make a parody of this …).

Anyway, I seem to be on a pitch of posting videos with music that I sort of enjoy and find pretty cool on a run, but  thentend to find a bit annoying after a bit.  Usually the vids have some sort of running or natural vista stuff in the background.  Like this. 

Potentially controversial question of the day… what is your take on the 26.2 bumper sticker?  I ain’t much of a bumper sticker guy (the last one I had was on the 82 Land Cruiser and it read “Men have feelings too, but who cares?”) anyway but I was recently asked as to why I roll my eyes at these.   I think that sort of feeling was well captured recently by Sean who stated “Most normal people think this is insane.  Most people who actually read this blog think this is trendy and lame.”  See, a marathon (or an IM, or a 100) is a pretty big deal.  But once you do one, and once you get into understanding what people have actually done with such events you realize how insignificant your accomplishment is in comparison.

Monday, January 23, 2012

Monday 012312

Today’s nuttiness is courtesy of JV … I’d be pretty nervous just running this … forget about a bike.

Sunday, January 22, 2012

Sunday 012212

Thanks to JJ for that one.

What recovery is.

This is a pretty cool vid also making the rounds.

Am I the only one who wonders about parents who sell fund raising things like cookies and popcorn for their kids in the office?  I get why the parents are doing it … and I get I don’t have to buy it.  And in this is pretty minor stuff, so I realize I am on shallow turf here … I have said to parents that ask me if I will buy this stuff that I would be happy to if their kid who is supposed to be doing the selling makes the pitch to me.   They sort of look at me appalled that I would even suggest such a thing.  No parent has ever taken me up on that.

gs

Training week ending 012212

Monday 011612 – slept like crap, and was up early but did not get out until 6:30ish.  Got out and checked out the eagles in the Carolyn Holmberg open space.  Felt pretty sluggish throughout.  10 miles, AHR 139, MHR 151.

Tuesday 01172012 – still felt pretty lethargic during the day and considered going easy.  Looked at the calendar for tomorrow and knew I would be pressed to get anything of substance in.  As a result I elected for a treadmill tempo for today, but mentally, I was pretty apprehensive.  It worked out, but I was not feeling mentally strong to start – even though I handled the workout just fine physically.  After 3 mile warm up (8:04, 7:40, 8:35  - with a bio break), I got to work.  Started at 9.2 mph and just tapped it up a tenth per mile.  6:30, 6:26, 6:22, 6:18, 6:14, 6:10 (38 minutes for 6 miles).  Good steady progression with HR building to 174.  Nuthin over the top.  1 mile warm down (7:43) to round it out to 10 miles

image

Wednesday 011812 – perhaps the worst sleep I have had this year.  I woke up at 2AM and I have no idea why.  I couldn’t get back to sleep so I actually watched the trials.  My eating all morning was a bit of a wreck because of this.  Mid AM I did a very burpy (amongst other things) 6 easy miles on the mill (MHR 149, AHR 146).  Probably did not need to hit the mill today, but it was nice to because I was backed up from a schedule perspective … and I think it is a bit softer on me as well.

Afternoon – understandably very tired but I knew I would be fine once I got going … 4 miles on the mill, with a half dozen strides of 200 yards at 5:20 pace (with 2:20 rest).  Then did some weight work, including bench step ups where I had 25lbs in each hand, ankle weights and stepped up on the bench 25x for each leading leg.  Right is weaker than the left.

Thursday 011912 –yup, day off.  Dealt to me with a full day of work meetings that ran over, parent teacher conferences in the evening, dinner with the family, and furniture moving for the floor project at the house.

Friday 012012consider getting out for long, and maybe embedding in some quality in here but it did not work out that way.  I was getting my butt kicked as I climbed out of the Coalton lot, often stood up by what I am guessing were 30 mph winds.  I was averaging over 10 minute pace on the run – all the way out to the Greenbelt Plateau lot.  From there, the winds began to be more at my tail and so things got a little zippier.  That said, I decided not to fight for a 3 hour jaunt, as my stomach was a bit pissed from last night’s poor choices, and my nose was running like a hydrant.  14 miles.

Saturday 012112Jim P clued me in that  FA 50k was starting nearby.  I had not seen him since the gathering at Brandon’s, and given its earlier start – I had no excuses.  I had no intentions of getting out for 30 miles, but I figured it would be good for a dozen or so, with me turning around at some point and getting back with some intervals.

After some pleasantries with Jim, Jerry and John, a group of (undisclosed number) headed out.  At about the same time, Bob showed up … holding a cup of coffee and a sweater that you’d probably be more likely to wear while sitting around at a mountain lodge versus going for a run.  We exchanged the typical round of stuff that resembles something like this: 

Then we got out running.  Well behind the group now, we made up some ground.  I got to meet Garret G – who I share a bond with as both he and I have been whipped mercilessly by Bob in the closing miles of an ultra.  Finally, I caught up to Jim, but it was about my turn around point (stating I had a longer honey do list than a fat ass event).  Bummer not to see much of him. 

I started back with the intent of doing several (6-8) half mile repeats at 5k race effort.  Bob joined me for the first two.  Out of the gate I could tell I had made some poor decisions leading up to this workout.  Poor diet choices earlier in the week that my gut was still recovering from, the bigger loop yesterday, and a 6.5 mile warm up for this.  Given the choice to bag it or press on, I chose to take the medicine.  Needless to say, with these “excuses” along with the fact that I was running trail, the splits were not great (only one was sub six pace, the rest were around 6:10 paceish), but the work got done.  Given I was slogging, I decided on the 8 rather than the six.

image

13 miles on the day.  All the days this week have been “okay.”  This is clearly (to me) because of my work, my diet this week.  In some regards, there is something to be said for me still getting after it even though the days have “meh.”  But I also recognize that if I want to move along, it more about the right choices outside of workouts … not just the workouts.

Sunday 01221213 miles, more than half in the dark pre dawn.  Felt fairly sluggish to start but opened up nicely towards the end.

Fair week in light of a variety of interruptions.  Work up a bit busier than I expected, I was sleeping poorly, seemed to be fighting some sort of cold thing and then I hit myself with the gut bomb.  70 miles, almost 10 hours.  No big run this week so I will make that a goal for next week.    In lieu of that this week, I did get a good set of middleish distance runs over the weekend (40 miles Fri-Sun).

P1220022

Saturday, January 21, 2012

Saturday 012112

Apparently listening to motivational music can have an effect on lactic acid clearance.

Rupp in Chicago?

Probably an easy dozen out in Broomstock in AM …early, if anyone is interested.

The race team gig is getting pretty heated back east (thanks JV).

Friday, January 20, 2012

Friday 012012

Good interview with Wellington on her decision to take a year off from IM.  Her time off is not discussed in this recent Dave Scott interview (as that preceded her announcement) but he reveals a bit as to how tough the Kona win was for her this year.

According to Jim P, the Southside 50K fat ass is starting from the Superior Townhall tomorrow at 7AM.  I might go out there for a few miles.  I was on the Dirty Bismarck loop today though and got my ass kicked.  Sure, the winds died down … from 60mph to 30mph (actually it got nice once I was heading back down wind later in the afternoon).  The trail however is in pretty good shape. 

According to Marathon Talk,  Ian Sharman and Ian Corliss are starting a ultra running podcast, due out the end of the month (called ultra talk).

Facebook … what do you all do when a friend request comes from someone you don’t know, or have not even corresponded with?  Part of me realizes I should not give a crap, but it feels a bit weird.  Then again, I don’t post much over there.  Or twitter for that matter.

Thursday, January 19, 2012

Thursday 011912

Got this from Ken.  They obviously have not met guys like this in their study.

More crossfit questioning.

Screw the 1600 at HS meets … bring back the mile.

Had a Broomfield Open Space and Trail Advisory Council meeting last night.  The City/County has employed three wildlife biologists to study the string of coyote bites that occurred this past year, and to make recommendations on how to proceed.   Yesterday was their first day here, and so they were not able to speak much about the Broomfield situation.  It was pretty interesting to hear about their backgrounds, including Stan Gerht’s experience with coyotes in the city of Chicago.  Apparently there are over 2000 coyotes living in that city (as a conservative estimate) -- with people walking within feet of them and not knowing it.  As a part of their activities here, there is some chatter about tagging / radio collaring of some coyotes as a way to track movements, etc.  There was a similar tracking story out here recently with the GPS collaring of bobcats.  Apparently bobcats can roam much larger territories than previously thought.

======================================================

Gets long after here …

Anyway, going back to yesterday’s Q&A … here are my answers/thoughts on those.  I will admit ahead of time they are a.)  probably not completely correct, b.)  are netted in the context of “ME” because I am selfish like that.  Or I am interested in approaching my training more effectively.  c.)  this is “relatively” brief … So that said … what they are in the context of my training, what that means, and how I determine those …

1.)  what is maximum aerobic function?  There is a lot out there about the Maffetone method and how to calculate it, and the success incurred by it when used by folks like Mark Allen.  Even after significant back and forth on it I still have some questions on it.  Those questions aside, these are activities where HR does not exceed 180-age+5 beats (for a long term athlete). 

What is interesting is that the pace at these heart rates can be highly varied.  On a treadmill at 0% grade, they tend to be around 7:25-7:40 right now – if I am feeling pretty good.  It would be about the same on a cool calm day on the track.   If I am still pretty whacked from a workout the day before (or even two days before) that can be much slower.  If outdoors on rougher terrain, hills, heat, wind, etc … the pace at those HRs can be much slower as well.

Hypothetically one could periodically test themselves at some fixed HR like this and see if they are progressing (getting faster) at that rate.  Once you get stuck (plateau), it is appropriate to change the stimulus in your training.  Typically efforts like this are considered appropriate for base building.  Arguably, there are those who get so fast at these HRs that they are physically challenging unto themselves (Allen apparently reached MAF runs at a pace of 5:20). 

For me, I put this at runs that are at/sub 145-150 HR.  For what it is worth, I don’t make myself a complete slave to the HR on such runs.  There are some days I am more disciplined at it than others.  As I have logged over 10k miles in the last three years I am less interested in these runs being a base building affair, but more about recovery.  There are some days those runs will actually be – based on my PE – at even a lower HR (sub 140 by coincidence) because I am thrashed.  There are some days where they might be higher (say sub 155) – like if I am running with friends in the hills on a warm day.  And, oh yeah, efforts exceeding a couple hours, maybe even 90 minutes … I get to a point where consideration of HR is not happening.

On a lot of true recovery days, this ends up being around 8:20 to 8:40 pace. 

2.)  what is lactate threshold?  I am not going to get into the biochemical science of what this is, but instead define this in terms of what it means to me for training.  As Sean said in the comments yesterday, “Tempo, fartlek, and threshold runs tend to improve LT if done right.” 

So it seems to me that this ends up for folks that don’t scientifically have their LT tested end up tossing this into a variety of “moderate” paces.  I have tended to like the definition of it is pace that you could sustain for a hour.  I have not done that sort of test recently but I feel this pace is going to be around (on a relatively flat course, good conditions), 6:15 to 6:20 pace for me, with a HR of 175ish.  I am primarily basing that guess off of the data that I got from the workout I did over on Davidson Mesa on 1/7 (six miles, averaged 6:20 pace, AHR 175).

And … so this might be faulted for me.  175 HR is about 97 percent of my current measured max (185).  That is probably considered way too high by many charts to be LT pace… so I need to chew on that some (including if that max is just not right).  For what it is worth, a six mile “tempo” on the mill (a completely different test than Davidson Mesa) averaging 6:20 pace averaged 168 (91%) (and the PE was lower too). 

… in any case, efforts in these paces (168-177) are one of the three harder runs I will look to accomplish in any week.  In my so called “reverse periodization” approach, these will generally be shorter flatter runs this spring (20-30) minutes and then they will build as the days get longer (hour, hour plus) and hillier.

3.)  what is V02 max? Again, I am not going to look to drill into the biochemical science of this type of work but instead define this in terms of what it means to me for training.  I have made some ground on making workouts of this type more consistent for me, as I am also dealing with a degradation of my “speed” at the 5k and 10k distances over the last five years.  Arguably some of this is because of aging (usually it declines about 1% a year), but I have clearly not had a block of training where I focus on it – with it being those intervals from 400 to 1000 meters.  If I toss in an 18 minute 5k (might be a bit aggressive there), the McMillian calculator has me working these intervals at these paces (around a 56 V02 max).

image

As I previously outlined, I see more of a consideration of this sort of work through March, April (assuming a Pikes run this year … still not 100 percent that is what will happen) – and so it will also be a one day a week workout.  HR just happens in these workouts.  No cap as far as I am concerned.

So there you mostly have it.  Three types of runs … recovery, LT and VO2 max. And then of course, the long run which will be the third run a week, or every other week.  Frankly, any of the above can contribute to those.  I can see doing a V02 max workout in the beginning of a long run, doing one at MAF, or building into tempo paces over the course of one.  All these (four) types runs are contributing to progress for now at increasing 5k, 10k fitness that I can then build on come the spring.  I outline this here because on any given day – I need to be able to highlight what I am doing and why in the above context.  I can see where there would be the irregular exception … a run just doing something ridiculous for the sake of goofing off.  The health of the head drives everything ultimately.

I welcome feedback on this, and will look to continue to explore this – particularly as I re-read this gem.  Tell me what is wrong, missing, overlooked, stupid … or spot on the mark.

Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Wednesday 011812

Okay … a bit of a poll, quiz, whatever … comment away as to what you think the following are.

1.)  what is maximum aerobic function?
2.)  what is lactate threshold?
3.)  what is V02 max?
4.)  what is aerobic threshold?

More specifically, what are the differences between those above and when should you utilize those differences in training?  How do you determine and measure these?

Great shot.
image 

Ritz has a post race perspective.

Now that the Olympic team for the marathon is determined, it is appropriate to begin to think about who makes it for the 10k and the 5k.  I can’t find a qualifier list for that though (although I can sort of start to figure it out from the marathon one).

I think JV should do this.

Lucho’s latest ‘cast

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Tuesday 011718

Hudson … with three of his athletes in the top baker’s dozen … he’s doing pretty well.

Runners Roost (local store chain) announces their 120 person racing team roster.

Marathons and heart attacks occur with less incidence than previously thought.

Apparently there was some football game this past weekend.  I guess I missed that.  And everyone else at the office missed the trials.

Monday, January 16, 2012

Monday 011611

Some pix from this AM’s run
P1160019
P1160011   
Some guys do Fatass events.  Some don’t.

Sunday, January 15, 2012

Sunday 011512

What is training?

Forget training … have ice cream

34 years with at least one running win.  Pretty stout.

Whoa … catching up on OT stuff (this was a better part of my evening actually).  I was able to gather the top three on the men’s side and the women’s side before we headed to the hills Saturday AM, but I missed a lot of the stories behind that.   I find this post race interview with Ritz – who finished just 8 seconds behind Abdi who earned the last OT spot - to be incredibly touching.  He is clearly upset by his fourth place finish, and he is trying to hold it together, but he can’t even look at the folks asking him questions.  He almost loses it when another OT runner comes through and asks him if he made it.  He grimaces and holds up four fingers.  Later a reporter asks him if he is disappointed and Dathan shouts “Of course I am disappointed!”

Wow. 

If I am reading this right, the oldest male finisher yesterday in the OT … Wardian.   There are a couple of 36 year olds in the final results (including first place winner Meb, and last place finisher but former Olympian Dan Browne), but Wardian tops the age game at 37.  (of course on the women’s side is Colleen at 47!)

The other “MUT” guy representing in the OT, King … PR’d.

Closest thing I can find to a comprehensive overall result list is over here.  (women)

On my run today, I noticed a new trailhead going in on that N-S road just east of the CTC complex where PI is.  Looks like it may head over to Rte 287 area.  Will need to check this out.

Training week ending 01162012

Monday 010912 – I woke up without an alarm pretty early and thought I would head out for some pre dawn full moon jogging.  I found myself pretty unmotivated to face the cold, mostly because I was still fairly sore from the weight work over the weekend. 

Even in the afternoon, I felt lethargic to start but mentally told myself  - screw it, and got to work.  Heck it was clear and 50 degrees out.  I decided not to care about HR, and just ran, pushing on dead legs, not feeling easy but not running fast or harder.  Just harder than I would if I stuck to a HR or feeling easy.  Not a good idea every day, but once in a while … 8 miles.  AHR, 157, MHR 168, average pace 7:50.  Ugh.

Clearly I am paying for doing the gym work that I did in the fashion I did:  off a speed workout and with more weight than typical.  That said, I’d like to think that sluggishness as a result will work out to be a good thing longer term.

Tuesday 011012 Slept in pretty hard again, so no early morning slogging under the moon.  Got out in the afternoon with mild temps (50s) and a breeze blowing out of the west.  Elected to do 8 x 600, with an equal jog, over on the same route as the 400s I did last Tuesday.  This rest is a bit too long, but I was fine with that as I was going to try to be going faster than desired 5k pace, essentially doing what I did for the 400s but adding on another 200 meters.  On the first I stopped the watch at .37 of a mile, established my landmark and then just worked from there.  This is something probably a bit more than 600 meters but close enough.

image
image

Like last week, my first one was a bit slow (2:02 or 5:37 pace), but I was able to work that down over the set (1:54 or about 5:03 pace on the last two).  Work done, work to be done.  Got the HR up to 182 on the last one which I think is the highest I have hit for a road workout this year (I hit 185 on a treadmill on Christmas eve).  10 miles.

Wednesday 011112 woke up ridiculously early after a less than effective night of sleep.  Pretty decent snow and wind out there so I hit the mill in the afternoon, just keeping it easy (sub 150).
image
10 treadmill miles.  After a very easy first mile (8 and change), I dialed in from a HR perspective and was floating easily at 7:30 to 7:40 pace.  The blip in the middle is when I was screwing around with a water bottle.

Thursday 011212 excellent sleep last night but again, no morning miles. 

Headed down to the office gym and the two treadmills were in use.  I decided to jump some rope, some weight work and some weighted step ups to get after it.  I tried to switch from exercise to exercise in a quick enough fashion that I was keeping my HR a bit elevated.  The weighted step ups were hard, and I can distinctly see that my right leg is weaker here.  Interestingly, my ability to do the single leg jumps is much less on my left leg. 

Hit the mill once one opened up and felt a bit unsure from the neck up but decided to get after it a bit and do something anyway.  I was on the fence as to whether to go hard or make for another easy day, but after a couple of miles I decided I was well enough to at least try. 

image

4 x 1 mile, 0 percent grade, max HR 182.  5:49, 5;49, 5:45, 5:43.  Half mile jog between each, for a total of 10 treadmill miles.  Not a spectacular workout but felt solid and working through the sets.

Friday 011312 I was unsure of what I would do today, as I wanted to get a bit of break from yesterday.  The winds (25mph) were not putting enticing me to get out.  JV put up the call for a mountain jaunt.  An afternoon on the trails, trying out my Santa provided Kathoola’s, in the lee of a hill, with a friend I have not run with in a bit was exactly what I needed.  

Climbing out of Cragmoor, we needed Kathoola’s immediately.  In the lot the wind was blowing pretty good.  Once we got up into the trees a bit, the wind cut down some.  I was slow in my running but steady through lower stretches.  Once we hit the mouth of Fern, we went to the power hike and I was digging my new traction on some of the icier segments. 

Above the gap however the wind picked up, and there was a complete mix of conditions – going from wind blown snow that was easy to tread over, to spinning my wheels in deeper snow on the inclines that spikes made no difference on, to post holing thigh deep.  The last third of a mile from the gap to the summit was tough with the snow, the exposure to the wind – at least for me.  I am not regularly used to that stuff, while JV as a season mountaineer probably saw it as a relatively minor outing.  Of course it was – but I heard my thighs grumbling.  We hit the summit (my first Bear Baggin of the year, and my first Front Range summit as well) is just a few ticks under a hour, and while the sunset was pretty cool – casting long shadows of the Flatirons out along the plains of the Front Range, we did not stay long.

The jaunt down to the gap was almost equally as challenging as it often represented skiing for me (something I suck at) – that is until I’d end up post holed or on my arse.  All in all, while cold and challenging – more than worth it all to get out with Jeff.  5 miles – but with about a 1000 a mile in the first 2.5 miles.

Saturday 011412 – the clan, the whole lot of us, headed up to Tahosa with the Scouts.  I considered for a bit doing some running around on the pond up there, or snow shoeing up higher, but the day easily slipped away with sledding, ice fishing and other goofing off.  0 miles.  First day of of the year.  I contemplate actually scheduling a regular day off, but it seems to work out a bit better for me just have them dealt to me like this.

Sunday 011512we got back from Tahosa and the weather was pretty mild.  Not sure what I would do (I told TZ “somewhere between 10 and 25” as I headed out), I ended up back at the house after 20.  Not zippy, but a bit longer at a steady pace so it was good work.  I sort of began to fall apart (thirsty) around 16 (I brought no water or fuel), but kept the run relatively together.  AHR was 153, MHR (in the climb up Mount Lac Amora home in the last mile) was 177.

A little bit of everything this week, except maybe overall volume (63 miles, a little less than 9 hours – all singles).  Some climbing (Bear), some interval work, a long run, some gym work.  If I am to truly adhere to the program I am thinking, this is a pretty good week except
a.)  the long run is probably not necessary every week.
b.)  another session in the gym would be good / appropriate
c.)  sub up one of the interval sessions for tempo work
d.)  the Bear climb – could be potentially a bad thing if targeting a race or a workout (but was very good for the head, heart).

But, generally … as long as I keep at a couple of sessions (up to three a week) of getting after it (a long run is such a thing but different), then I am confident on making progress.  The key will be to allow those sessions be the focus.

I kept track of the diet during the week, but did nothing to track it over the weekend up at Tahosa (where the diet was probably pretty crappy anyway).  I am going to look to keep doing this as it keeps me a bit focused on what I am putting in my mouth a bit more …

Ah, yes … now for a Sunday night of catching up on all the post OT interwebbings.