I slept pretty hard last night, and that was nice. I had a brief wake up at 0530 and considered getting up for an early morning run but the gravity in the bed increased dramatically at the moment ... I did not escape until 7:15.
I felt surprisingly good post yesterday's long run. Not fully recovered, mind you ... but enough to consider doing a hard effort today. I kept trying to mentally juggle how I could manage harder workouts earlier this week and still be ready to roll at the end of the week (be it races or Pikes recon).
I decided I'd run the Flagstaff Road (prior run by me and JV reference ...1, 2, 3, 4) as a tempo run up and down. It was pre
tty hot as I broke out in the afternoon, so I grabbed a water bottle, and started the run from Chautauqua. After a short warmup from the cottage (4:15) I saw Rickey Gates (he got 9th at the Trail Championships in Steamboat, told me Jon Severy won, although I can't find any results on line!) at the bottom of Gregory, chatted with him for a bit and then got to business on the climb. Suddenly those legs that were not feeling so bad began to protest. I overruled this whining, but realized that I am not going to kill this run ... I compromised with the legs and we agreed to make a good workout from this. I reached the turn in about 25, and I was sweating my tookus off. The last part ... let's say it is tough climbing to the Lost Gulch Overlook. 'nuff said. Reached the top in 41:30. Not zippy but 90 seconds faster than four weeks ago. In light of the heat and the long run yesterday, I will give it a grade of a B+ ... it certainly was a good workout.
Then the run down ... I was not flying but it felt good to be rolling sub six, even if it was gravity aided. Came back under 29, in control but pushing the HR up some. A good workout on whole. I will look to do this one again. While it is not trail, it has some tough grades, and a sustained distance for a good long hard up run where you don't need to worry about footing.
75 minutes round trip. On a different front ...I race Pikes and most trail races in road flats, simply because I like
the lighter touch and the feel of the shoe. I don't feel I get a lot out of a heavier more aggressive trail shoe for races (although in training, I do appreciate the greater support, cushion). These shoes have been worn maybe 10-15 times, including one Pikes marathon trip, and one Barr Trail Race trip. Since then, I have worn the
m on a couple of runs on Green, Bear, etc. Let's say that the typical mileage considerations for flats go out the window when you wear them on trails. At least for me. Nonetheless, I roll with these for as long as I can. And even though they are ripped up, they don't feel too bad, except maybe on some of the trail downs. All that said, I think these are about done.
I am taking some time off later this
week to extend the holiday weekend. I am contemplating a mid week longish run up high via something closer than Pikes (like Audubon - a 13er) which is 30 miles away rather than 100) ... simply to get up high, to re-familiarize myself with that area (I have not been there in several years). Still working the logistics on this, if I do it ...not sure if I want to do this because it is an adventure of sorts of if I just want to get HIGH.
Today's quote /lyric... from
On the other side, if I hydrate well, it starts an upward cycle. Coincidently, Lucho
the Celtics and Lakers,
myself up there that in early in the AM, and I am pining for go up Green this afternoon. I'd really dig the company with the gang doing the MAF test, but given the choice of running in circles first thing in the morning keeping my HR under 148 OR hanging with my wife for breakfast and then getting a hill in the afternoon ... easy choice. I have been wondering why I often look at scientific evidence for training approaches and then do stuff in my training that is the opposite of that. Or I will often elect to do some workout or training that is less than the ideal workout (when considered scientifically) for that day. These choices bugs me a bit, because I am a scientist by my education, and I drive data objective driven decisions in my work as much as possible. So why do I end up making decisions that are subjective, ones that might leave me being less than my absolute best as an athlete? While I am interested in the science, and I try to embrace it so that I can be a better athlete, I get to a point where I just want to be out there, running in the hills, enjoying some time with friends, rolling a single track, smelling the pines, hearing the hummers. I know these activities are not exclusive of science or choices that promote the best most effective training, but, well, sometimes they are. I just want to embrace that moment. I think som e people call this the caveman mentality. Does this mean I make choices where I am being less than the most effective in my training? Probably. I can live with that. I think if I had to make all my training choices based on what made me the best athlete, I'd end up choosing to not train at all. Does it mean I settle for a time or a place that is less than what I could accomplish? Maybe. But I will have enjoyed the journey, not just the ends. The choices I make for my body have to also be supported by my soul, my heart.
beautiful things of getting older is that your body produces nastier and nastier smells from all your crevices and holes? Is that a function of just accumulating more nasty stuff in your body over time? And it seems that a shower with soap (Ivory) is just not good enough anymore. Nope, I need to mask over this stuff with some sort of deodorant if I expect to keep it at bay for more than a few hours. I elect the old man's stuff ... enough foo foo smell to cover the nasty stuff, not too perfumy, and not an anti persperant that is heavy with aluminum. And yes, this is perhaps all TMI. Maybe it was just because it was actually hot yesterday versus this extended spring we have been having.
I knew the run was going to be a challenge for me because the "weeds of discontent and excuse" were growing quite a bit in my head: "your legs are heavy, you ran long yesterday, don't you think you need a break?" I decided to apply a liberal dose of TFU ... and did the JW over at Westminster Hills. Once I started to get into the workout, and knock down some of the repeats ... my head decompressed and cleared. Yeah, it was not as fast as I would have liked it, because my legs were heavy but it was a decent workout nonetheless. Westminster Hills (map) above is an okay place to run ... it is just not as hilly as the title would lead you to believe. (for those not recalling the JW, it is a warmup (10 mins for me today), 6 x 2 minutes on (I take 90 seconds rest between), 5 minutes on (I then take 2:30 off), 6 x 1 minute on (I take 45 seconds rest in between except after the last where I took a minute) and then five minutes on. I rounded out the run to 70 minutes with the warm down.
I headed up the Homestead trail (instead of Towhee ... simply because I hardly ever take Homestead and I wanted to see what it looked like again), into the Mesa, to Shadow Canyon (24 min), up Shadow (27:50) to the Saddle. It was spittin' a bit of snow as I ascended Shadow, so I put on the wind breaker. It was quiet other than the wind, and on this whole run - I only saw one person above the Mesa trail (and even that came on the latter descent). I kept the effort real easy, resorting to power hiking whenever necessary to avoid a red line. Up to So Bo in just under an hour. Doubled back to Bear (72 min), and then carefully plucked down the nasty upper stretches of Fern (12:30 back to the Saddle on the Fern side). Nonetheless, I took a spill as the loose talus slipped from under me. A tree and bike gloved hands saved me from significant damage. 25 minutes from the top of Bear back to the Mesa trail (forcing me to recall that time that Jeff and I ran down in the snow all the way back to Cragmoor in under 22), on the Mesa for a bit and the Bluestem ... completing the loop in right at 2 hours. Mission accomplished. Back to the house for some scrambled egg - avocado breakfast burritos.
as this guy did runs and spins and fly bys over our building ... close enough that it set off car alarms in the parking lot. It has been a long time since I worked on military aircraft and so I have forgotten a bit how a fighter can seem to rip through the sky in a way that seems to defy what is rationale, and allowable within the laws of physics. It actually seems to tear the fabric of the air, gravity sound, and creates a wave of energy that you feel even though you are miles from it. It is not too hard to imagine how frightening such a force could be in a battle if it were approaching you.
I did the