AM – 9.5 miles before we headed to the airport. Legs were bit tired from yesterday’s sprints, but moved fairly well. Chilly (34F) compared to what I was dealing with earlier in the week.
Lighter week – 70.5 with the travel and a day off expected (tomorrow). Next week is expected to be the lightest in a bit.

I have regularly marveled at the depth of high school running these days – particularly in comparison to when I ran. While the top end times of kids have not changed significantly, the number of kids running times that at some “next tier” seems to have moved. Frank Shorter supposedly once said, “Of course you ran the mile in 4:30 in High School. Everyone did.” That seems to be 4:20 today. The sub 10 3200 kids of the 80s are sub 9:30 of today.
It is not a huge shift but it is noticeable, particularly to a guy who ego was and is tied in some part to his performance in the sport (today and 30 years ago).
So of course, I have wondered why this is the case. I have no hard facts but a couple of hunches. Here they are:
1.) The number of kids that do XC and track probably has grown. There is probably some data there that I can go look up to determine that objectively, but I can see slight evidence of it. Fairview HS apparently has 100 kids on the XC team. Cherry Creek put some 50 girls up in the open race yesterday.
These are big teams. I think my HS XC team back east was maybe 25 kids at most.
Of course, if you have more kids, you essentially have more lottery tickets to where you are going to get a kid that is talented, willing to work hard, and put up some fast times. Perhaps if you on a squad of 20, you might not need to work as hard to get to be on the top seven as if you are on a squad of 60.
Perhaps more kids are in XC as well given the decline of youth football, the increasing exclusivity we see in other sports like baseball and soccer. By that I mean, if a kid today wants to be playing HS ball, they usually are dedicating themselves to that sport in a “specialty” manner at a young age. JZ saw this when he was playing baseball a bit more competitively. It was practice 3-4 nights a week year round … as a 9 year old. Whether that is right or wrong is probably a different post and probably specific to the individual kid, but I am sure it drives some kids away from those sports that would have otherwise continued to operate on its fringe. They might walk onto the ultimate participation sport come their freshman year … XC.
2.) Okay, increased participants means more kids that could be fast. But more kids are fast (4:30 to 4:20, 10 to 9:30). I heard a new wrinkled on the why on this on a podcast Jay Johnson recently did on his highschoolrunningcoach website. In interview the NXN champ coach from Gig Harbor, they discussed how a big focus of their training is LT efforts, with little emphasis on maximal efforts.
Okay, what does that mean? Jay went so far to describe that the standard workout HS kids did in the 70s and 80s was 8 (or 10 or 12 or 16) x 400 on little rest. I recall looking to “rip” these workouts. They were full on melt your face off sessions against your team mates.
And I loved them. I still love to do them today. When I am not scared of them.
But, they probably were not good for us. They often left us injured (4 of our top 7 were out injured or completely thrashed by the end of the season my senior year) and … more importantly, why that workout has some translation into good running over 4-5k in XC, it is not really specific. It might make you a good miler, and yeah it might make you a good XC runner too. But it is not the best workouts to do that given the risk and lack of specificity.
In the interview, the discussion focused on that more efforts at sub maximal, LT and fartlek type or tempo type efforts that are of the stuff that is making more kids faster these days. They get the specificity necessary for longer efforts, they don’t go to the well as much and can manage a longer build of a season (more build means more progress), they don’t burn out.
Again, I don’t know if that is true. It smells like there could be truth in it over large populations, and certainly individuals will see a variety in results. The case of one does not make for a good case.
I will keep thinking about it. In the interim, we made it through airport security.
